For this open entry, I feel intrigued to write about an article I recently read for my Genre Expert Project, titled Comprehension Strategy Instruction: Teaching Narrative Text Structure Awareness by Susan Dymock (2007). A concept that I keep finding myself coming back to is the parallel processes of reading and writing. I found that this article ties reading comprehension and the construction of narrative writing together very nicely, emphasizing the importance of text structure awareness. This may seem obvious, but sometimes reading and writing can seem like different, isolated tasks and until this semester, I have not examined the parallels between the two in such depth. This makes me want to highlight the similarities between these processes in my future classrooms. I wonder how early that can be expressed to students through instruction? I anticipate I will begin teaching 1st or 2nd grade, where students are just beginning to engage in the writing process and start reading more advanced books. I am curious how they would react to reading and writing highlighted as similar processes.
From Tompkins (2012) and Dymock (2007), I have developed an understanding that explicit instruction of text structure, more specifically, the elements of specific genres, can support students across their reading, writing, and their comprehension. Through my exploration of the narrative genre thus far, there has been an emphasis on the story elements, or story grammars as Dymock (2007) calls them. These are the setting, theme, characters, plot, and resolution that are “an attempt to construct a set of rules that can generate a structure for any story” (p. 161) and provide “an overall structure for teaching narrative text structure awareness” (p. 162). These are key elements that students should be able to identify and construct while reading and writing the narrative genre.
Not only does this article delve into the significance of explicit instruction of the narrative text structure, but it introduces the visual representations of the narrative structure analysis. For example, the story graph. This reminds me of what I learned in school, that the hill is the rising action, leading to the peak of the mountain, which is the climax of the story, and following that is the falling action. Dymock (2007) describes that “story graph[s] visually represent how plot develops, showing the high and low action points of the story as it progresses over time” (p. 163).
Below is an image from this article, which shows one example of a story graph. This visual is a bit different from what I remember from school, so I think it is interesting to include.
Further reflecting on the connections between our course textbook and the article I selected for my Genre Expert Project was a valuable experience. It further solidified what I consider are the most significant takeaways from this article, that I may very well include in my presentation.
References
Seuss, G. T. (1979). The Lorax, by dr. Seuss. Random House.
Elise, I found your reflection in this entry quite intriguing. I felt like I was working through the story map with you. At the start of your entry you noted that you are curious to know more about how first/second graders "would react to reading and writing highlighted as similar processes." As you concluded this discussion you note that you feel your knowledge has been solidified about how to understand text structure. I wondered if you also felt that the modification you made to the story graph would help those students understand the parallel nature of reading and writing narratives?
ReplyDeletePS. Don't forget to give your entry a more specific title. For example:
ReplyDeleteEntry #7: Considering Key Elements of Narrative